← Every company

AT&T Inc Workplace Safety

OSHA inspected AT&T Inc 16 times in the period on file, issuing citations at 0. A willful citation is the agency saying the employer knew; a repeat one is it saying they had been told before.

T on carbonthat →
Inspections
16
Produced citations
0
16 found nothing
Willful or repeat
0
the agency saying they knew
Penalties proposed
—
often negotiated down

Where the inspections were

By proposed penalties. An establishment is a single site, so one company can appear in a state many times.

StateInspectionsPenalties proposed
CA8—
LA2—
MO1—
WA1—
IN1—
VA1—
KY1—
MI1—

16 inspections

Newest first. A row with no citation badge is an inspection that found nothing to cite.

EstablishmentPenalty
AT&T STOREBSAN PABLO, CA2026-08-03—
AT&T SERVICES, INC.BSACRAMENTO, CA2026-06-25—
AT&T SERVICES INC.CHOUMA, LA2026-06-23—
AT&T STOREATARZANA, CA2026-05-01—
AT&TBSAINT LOUIS, MO2026-04-20—
AT&T SERVICES INCHSEATTLE, WA2014-11-24—
AT&T INDIANABINDIANAPOLIS, IN2014-08-13—
AT&T MOBILITYBCERRITOS, CA2014-07-18—
AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLCBFRESNO, CA2014-07-14—
AT&TBTUSTIN, CA2014-06-23—
AT&T MOBILITYBLEBANON, VA2014-06-19—
AT&TCSANTA ROSA, CA2014-06-11—
AT&T SERVICES, INC.BHAYWARD, CA2014-05-21—
AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLCBPADUCAH, KY2014-04-30—
AT & T MOBILITY LLCHROYAL OAK, MI2014-04-29—
AT& THBAKER, LA2014-04-22—

Source: the Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement data. Inspections are matched to companies by the establishment name OSHA recorded, and the name is printed as recorded so a wrong match is visible — a site operated under a franchise or a subsidiary name may be missing rather than clean. Penalties are what OSHA proposed, which is frequently negotiated down afterwards and is not what was paid.

More on T

Related datasets